CARBON TAX AND CARBON EMISSIONS IN ASEAN: EXPLORING THE MODERATING ROLE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY PENETRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61261/taxpedia.v3i2.92Kata Kunci:
carbon tax, carbon emission, renewable energy, ASEANAbstrak
This study examines the impact of carbon tax implementation on per capita carbon emissions in ASEAN countries, highlighting the moderating role of renewable energy within the national energy mix. Motivated by the urgent need to balance economic growth with emission reduction in developing regions, the research applies a quantitative approach using Dynamic Panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) with secondary data from the World Bank, OECD, IMF, and IEA covering 2010–2023. The findings reveal that adopting a carbon tax significantly reduces carbon emissions, confirming its effectiveness as a fiscal environmental policy instrument. Moreover, the share of renewable energy not only directly reduces emissions but also enhances the effectiveness of the carbon tax, indicating a strong synergistic effect when both policies are implemented simultaneously. The interaction between carbon tax and renewable energy proves to be significantly negative, suggesting that countries with higher renewable energy penetration benefit more from carbon tax policies. Among control variables, economic growth and urbanization are associated with higher emissions, while trade openness shows no significant effect. These results provide critical implications for ASEAN policymakers to integrate carbon taxation with renewable energy expansion strategies and reinvest tax revenues in green technology development. The study contributes novel evidence to environmental economics by validating Pigouvian Tax theory and policy mix frameworks in the context of Southeast Asian economies.
Referensi
Aditya Abadiyah, F. (2023). Peran Pajak Lingkungan, Pembangunan Keuangan, Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Terhadap Lingkungan Berkelanjutan Di Negara D-8. Taxpedia; Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting, 1(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.61261/muctj.v1i2.38
Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2002). A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00005-8
Anbumozhi, V., Kalirajan Emeritus Professor, K., & Pratiwi Muyasyaroh, A. (2025). Putting a Price on Carbon in ASEAN and East Asia: Are Consumers Willing to Pay? ERIA Discussion Paper Series, 549. https://www.eria.org/uploads/Putting-a-Price-Carbon-ASEAN-Are-Consumers-Willing-to-Pay.pdf
Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and Co2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170144
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.002
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Barus, E. B., & Wijaya, S. (2022). Penerapan Pajak Karbon Di Swedia Dan Finlandia Serta Perbandingannya Dengan Indonesia. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i2.1653
Best, R., Burke, P. J., & Jotzo, F. (2020). Carbon Pricing Efficacy: Cross-Country Evidence. Environ Resource Econ, 77, 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00436-x
Bibi, R. (2022). The relationship between trade openness, financial development and economic growth: evidence from Generalized method of moments. Journal of Environmental Science and Eco- Nomics.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Böhringer, C., Landis, F., & Rutherford, T. F. (2017). Carbon tax alternatives for the European Union: A general equilibrium perspective. Climate Policy, 17(S1), S1–S16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1266546
Chen, W., & Lei, Y. (2018). The impacts of carbon tax on carbon emission reduction and economic development in China. Energy Policy, 119, 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.056
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Haites, E., & Proost, S. (2018). Policy mixes for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 18(8), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1446987
Hasni, R., Dridi, D., & Ben Jebli, M. (2023). Do financial development, financial stability and renewable energy disturb carbon emissions? Evidence from asia–pacific economic cooperation economics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(35), 83198–83213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28418-8
Hossain, M. S. (2012). An econometric analysis for CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 3(3), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2012.33014
Huang, Y., Chen, F., Wei, H., Xiang, J., Xu, Z., & Akram, R. (2022). The Impacts of FDI Inflows on Carbon Emissions: Economic Development and Regulatory Quality as Moderators. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.820596
Ibrahim, R. L., Al-mulali, U., Ozturk, I., Bello, A. K., & Raimi, L. (2022). On the criticality of renewable energy to sustainable development: do green financial development, technological innovation, and economic complexity matter for …. Renewable Energy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122012769
IEA. (2019). ASEAN Renewable Energy Integration Analysis. Iea.Org. https://www.iea.org/reports/asean-renewable-energy-integration-analysis
IEA. (2023). ASEAN Renewables Investment: Opportunities and Challenges. Iea.Org. https://www.iea.org/search?q=ASEAN
Khan, H., Chen, T., Bibi, R., & Khan, I. (2023). Dose institutional quality influences the relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions ? PLoS ONE, 18(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291930
Liddle, B. (2014). Urbanization and energy use in Asian developing countries: A panel cointegration analysis. Asian Development Review, 31(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00019
Lolo, L. D. F. A., Maulana, A. D., & Pasaribu, D. N. (2022). Transparansi Pajak Karbon: Digitalisasi Pajak Karbon Sebagai Katalisator Dalam Pembangunan Rendah Karbon di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction, 5(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i1.32981
Metcalf, G. E., & Stock, J. H. (2020). Measuring the macroeconomic impact of carbon taxes. American Economic Review, 110(12), 3917–3954. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190621
Palupi, P. G. S., Muchtar, M., & Sihombing, P. R. (2023). Pengaruh Pajak Karbon, Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Fosil, Dan Pertumbuhan PDB Terhadap Emisi Karbon. Jurnalku, 3(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v3i2.385
Rasiah, R., & Vijayaraghavan, G. K. (2025). Greening in Southeast Asia (O. Academic (ed.); online edn). The Oxford Handbook on the Greening of Economic Development. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198883487.013.25
Saddler, H., Diesendorf, M., & Denniss, R. (2020). Greenhouse solutions with sustainable energy. UNSW Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203044012
Shaari, M. S., Hussain, N. E., Rahim, R. A., Ridzuan, A. R., & Masnan, F. (2025). Coal consumption as a moderator in the link between industrial output and life expectancy in ASEAN nations. Carbon Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00202-y
Shaikh, S. S., Amin, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Song, H. (2024). Going Green in ASEAN: Assessing the Role of Eco-Innovation, Green Energy, Industrialization, and Environmental Taxes in Achieving Carbon Neutrality. Sustainability Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3305
Shidiq, M., Htet, H., Rakhiemah, A. N., Abdullah, A., Pradnyaswari, I., & Suryadi, B. (2024). How effective is the carbon pricing implementation in ASEAN Member States to reduce regional emissions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1395(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1395/1/012032
Yu, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2022). The Synergy Green Innovation Effect of Green Innovation Subsidies and Carbon Taxes. Energy for the Future: Participatory and Multidisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Post-Carbon Cities and Societies, 14(6), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063453
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Fajriyatul Abadiyah, Irna Bontor Febyola

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
