DO AUDIT COMMITTEE CHAIR CHARACTERISTICS MATTER FOR CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE? EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
Keywords:
audit committee chair, affiliation, connection, corporate tax avoidanceAbstract
Abstract
Corporate tax avoidance remains a complex issue, making the role of corporate governance mechanisms in shaping firms’ tax strategies increasingly important. Although prior studies have examined the board of directors, CEO characteristics, and audit committee attributes, the influence of the audit committee chair remains underexplored. This study investigates the impact of audit committee chair characteristics on corporate tax avoidance in Indonesian consumer cyclical firms. The examined characteristics include military connections, political connections, family affiliations, financial affiliations, and the number of positions held by the audit committee chair. Using 141 firm-year observations from 77 firms during 2021–2023, this study employs multiple linear regression, with tax avoidance proxied by the cash effective tax rate (CETR). Since CETR is inversely related to tax avoidance, higher CETR indicates lower tax avoidance. The findings show that military-connected audit committee chairs are associated with lower tax avoidance, whereas financial affiliations are associated with higher tax avoidance. Political connections, family affiliations, and the number of positions held have no significant effect. The study contributes to governance-based tax avoidance literature and offers insights for tax monitoring policies.
Abstrak
Penghindaran pajak perusahaan merupakan isu kompleks sehingga peran mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan dalam membentuk strategi pajak semakin penting untuk dikaji. Meskipun penelitian sebelumnya telah membahas dewan direksi, karakteristik CEO, dan komite audit, pengaruh ketua komite audit masih relatif kurang diperhatikan. Penelitian ini menginvestigasi pengaruh karakteristik ketua komite audit terhadap penghindaran pajak perusahaan pada perusahaan sektor consumer cyclical di Indonesia. Karakteristik yang diteliti meliputi koneksi militer, koneksi politik, afiliasi keluarga, afiliasi keuangan, serta jumlah jabatan yang dipegang oleh ketua komite audit. Dengan menggunakan 141 observasi perusahaan-tahun dari 77 perusahaan selama periode 2021–2023, penelitian ini menerapkan regresi linier berganda, dengan penghindaran pajak diproksikan melalui cash effective tax rate (CETR). Karena CETR berhubungan terbalik dengan penghindaran pajak, CETR yang lebih tinggi menunjukkan penghindaran pajak yang lebih rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketua komite audit berkoneksi militer berasosiasi dengan penghindaran pajak yang lebih rendah, sedangkan afiliasi keuangan berasosiasi dengan penghindaran pajak yang lebih tinggi. Koneksi politik, afiliasi keluarga, dan jumlah jabatan tidak berpengaruh signifikan.
References
Abdelmoula, L., Chouaibi, S., & Chouaibi, J. (2022). The effect of business ethics and governance score on tax avoidance: A European perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(4), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2021-0219
Adela, V., Agyei, S. K., & Peprah, J. A. (2023). Antecedents of tax aggressiveness of listed non-financial firms: Evidence from an emerging economy. Scientific African, 20, e01654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01654
Al Lawati, H., & Hussainey, K. (2021). Do overlapped audit committee directors affect tax avoidance? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14100487
Almutairi, A. M., & Abdelazim, S. I. (2025). The impact of CSR on tax avoidance: The moderating role of political connections. Sustainability, 17(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010195
Amara, N., Bouzgarrou, H., Bourouis, S., Alshdaifat, S. M., & Al Amosh, H. (2025). The interaction effect of female leadership in audit committees on the relationship between audit quality and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010027
Athira, A., & Ramesh, V. K. (2023). COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. International Business Review, 32(4), 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102143
Azizkhani, M., Hossain, S., & Nguyen, M. (2023). Effects of audit committee chair characteristics on auditor choice, audit fee and audit quality. Accounting & Finance, 63(3), 3675–3707. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13058
Baatwah, S. R., Mgammal, M. H., & Aomrah, M. R. (2025). Does audit committee chair expertise combat tax avoidance in emerging markets? Direct and indirect investigation. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2024-0342
Bach, T. N., Le, T., Luong, B. T., & Vu, H. V. (2025). Credit constraints and corporate tax payments: Evidence from Vietnamese firms. Economic Systems, 49(3), 101305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101305
Chen, C., Wang, D., & Wang, B. (2023). Interface between context and theory: The application and development of agency theory in the Chinese context. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2019-0433
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2017). Changes in corporate effective tax rates over the past 25 years. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.001
Fayad, A. A. S., Khatib, S. F. A., Abbas, A. F., Ghaleb, B. A. A., & Mousa, A. K. A. (2025). The determinants and consequences of board multiple directorships. Corporate Governance, 25(2), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2023-0310
Gao, Y., Li, J., & Wu, Y. (2025). Competition and tax avoidance: Evidence from quasi natural experiment of the implementation of anti-trust law. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, 103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103900
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Harymawan, I., Putra, F. K. G., Rizki, A., & Nasih, M. (2022). Innovation intensity of military-connected firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-12-2020-0616
Harymawan, I., Rahayu, N. K., Kamarudin, K. A., Wan Ismail, W. A., & Ratri, M. C. (2023). CEO busyness and investment efficiency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0083
Harymawan, I., Wardani, D. A. K., & Nowland, J. (2024). Military directors and audit fees. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 14(3), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-06-2022-0158
Hendayana, Y., Ramdhany, M. A., Pranowo, A. S., Rachmat, R. A. H., & Herdiana, E. (2024). Exploring impact of profitability, leverage and capital intensity on avoidance of tax, moderated by size of firm in LQ45 companies. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2371062. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371062
Hossain, M. S., Ali, M. S., Islam, M. Z., Safiuddin, M., Ling, C. C., & Fung, C. Y. (2025). The nexus of firms characteristics and tax avoidance: Do independent directors have a role? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 15(3), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2024-0120
Iazzi, A., Vacca, A., Maizza, A., & Schiavone, F. (2023). The role of corporate board and auditors in tax planning: Evidence from Italy. Management Research Review, 46(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2021-0518
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kementerian Keuangan. (2024). APBN Kita Desember 2024. https://media.kemenkeu.go.id/getmedia/be27c9e1-082c-4000-b795-ffe76296c191/APBN-KiTa-Desember-2024.pdf?ext=.pdf
Kementerian Keuangan. (2025). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat (LKPP) 2024. https://media.kemenkeu.go.id/getmedia/09145006-6848-4594-97c3-83f09bfb07f8/LKPP-2024.pdf?ext=.pdf
Khatib, S. F. A., & Sulimany, H. G. H. (2025). Board busyness and biodiversity disclosure practices: A global evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2024-1070
Khelil, I., & Khlif, H. (2023). Tax avoidance in family firms: A literature review. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2022-0064
Khlifi, S., Chouaibi, Y., & Chouaibi, S. (2025). Do ESG practices mediate the relationship between board characteristics and tax avoidance in G20 countries? Corporate Governance, 25(2), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2023-0498
Koay, G. Y., & Sapiei, N. S. (2025). The role of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance: A developing country perspective. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 15(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2023-0022
Marill, K. A., & Lewis, R. J. (2004). Advanced statistics: Linear regression, part II: Multiple linear regression. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1197/S1069-6563(03)00601-8
Medhioub, N., & Boujelbene, S. (2024). Tax avoidance and cost of debt: Does integrated report assurance matter? Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2022-0114
Ngah, Z. A., Ismail, N., & Hamid, N. A. (2022). A cohesive model of predicting tax evasion from the perspective of fraudulent financial reporting amongst small and medium sized enterprises. Accounting Research Journal, 35(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2020-0315
Oktaviani, R. M., Wulandari, S., & Sunarto. (2023). Multinational corporate tax avoidance in Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), e01549. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1549
Paramayuda, A. A. R., Hashim, U. J., & Harymawan, I. (2025). STEM CEOs and tax avoidance: Evidence from top sustainable companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2024-0501
Pavićević, S., & Keil, T. (2025). The role of military directors in holding the CEO accountable for poor firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 46(3), 790–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3675
Qawqzeh, H. K., & Al Zobi, M. K. (2025). The effect of female percentage and audit committee characteristics on tax avoidance: Audit quality as a moderating variable. Accounting Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2024-0367
Rashid, M. H. U., Begum, F., Hossain, S. Z., & Said, J. (2024). Does CSR affect tax avoidance? Moderating role of political connections in Bangladesh banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(4), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2022-0364
Rossi, F., Calce, A. M., Micheli, A. P., & Salvi, A. (2025). Religiosity and agency costs: Investigating Italian unlisted companies. Management Decision, 63(13), 174–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2024-1259
Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P., & Yagüe, J. (2021). Financial reporting incentives, earnings management, and tax avoidance in SMEs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(7–8), 1404–1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12519
Sanoran, K. (Lek). (2025). Corporate tax avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating role of audit firm tenure: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2024-0900
Seth, H., & Saxena, A. (2025). Demystifying the nexus of audit committee characteristics and sustainability performance. Managerial Finance, 51(8), 1352–1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2024-0434
Singhania, A. K., & Panda, N. M. (2025). Does audit committee composition influence firm performance? Evidence from the top NSE-listed non-financial companies of India. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-10-2023-0333
Souguir, Z., Lassoued, N., & Bouzgarrou, H. (2024). CEO overconfidence and tax avoidance: Role of institutional and family ownership. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 20(3), 768–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-12-2022-0545
Stanley, N., & Widianingsih, L. P. (2024). Women in the boardroom: A catalyst for tax avoidance? El-Mal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi & Bisnis Islam, 5(12), 5230–5247. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmal.v5i12.5205
Stanley, N., & Widianingsih, L. P. (2025). Profitability meets responsibility: The role of board gender diversity in shaping corporate tax avoidance behaviour. Ekombis Review: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 13(3), 2847–2860. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v13i3.7909
Sugeng, L. N. M., & Radianto, W. E. D. (2025). Board, gender, education, and size: Can they suppress tax avoidance? Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 10(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v10i1.654
Sulub, Y. A., & Haron, R. (2025). Shari’ah governance and performance of Islamic banks: Do Shari’ah supervisory board independence and busyness matter? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2024-0387
Tsai, P. H., Liu, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Collusion, political connection, and tax avoidance in China. Kyklos, 74(3), 417–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12265
Uyanık, G. K., & Güler, N. (2013). A study on multiple linear regression analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027
Wahab, E. A. A., Harymawan, I., Wardani, D. A. K., & Nasih, M. (2025). Military-experienced directors, CEO busyness and financial statement footnotes readability: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 33(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2023-0246
Wahab, E. A. A., Wardani, D. A. K., Harymawan, I., & Nasih, M. (2024). Military connections, corporate governance and corporate tax avoidance. Pacific Accounting Review, 36(3/4), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2023-0033
Xu, Y. (2024). The effect of tax avoidance on earnings persistence: Evidence from China. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-04-2023-0086
Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., Martin, G. P., & Wiseman, R. M. (2021). Stakeholder agency relationships: CEO stock options and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 782–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12623
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nicklaus Stanley, Luky Patricia Widianingsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
TAXPEDIA: Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
