CARBON TAX AND CARBON EMISSIONS IN ASEAN: EXPLORING THE MODERATING ROLE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY PENETRATION

Authors

  • Fajriyatul Abadiyah University of Bangka Belitung
  • Irna Bontor Febyola University of Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61261/taxpedia.v3i2.92

Keywords:

carbon tax, carbon emission, renewable energy, ASEAN

Abstract

This study examines the impact of carbon tax implementation on per capita carbon emissions in ASEAN countries, highlighting the moderating role of renewable energy within the national energy mix. Motivated by the urgent need to balance economic growth with emission reduction in developing regions, the research applies a quantitative approach using Dynamic Panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) with secondary data from the World Bank, OECD, IMF, and IEA covering 2010–2023. The findings reveal that adopting a carbon tax significantly reduces carbon emissions, confirming its effectiveness as a fiscal environmental policy instrument. Moreover, the share of renewable energy not only directly reduces emissions but also enhances the effectiveness of the carbon tax, indicating a strong synergistic effect when both policies are implemented simultaneously. The interaction between carbon tax and renewable energy proves to be significantly negative, suggesting that countries with higher renewable energy penetration benefit more from carbon tax policies. Among control variables, economic growth and urbanization are associated with higher emissions, while trade openness shows no significant effect. These results provide critical implications for ASEAN policymakers to integrate carbon taxation with renewable energy expansion strategies and reinvest tax revenues in green technology development. The study contributes novel evidence to environmental economics by validating Pigouvian Tax theory and policy mix frameworks in the context of Southeast Asian economies.

References

Aditya Abadiyah, F. (2023). Peran Pajak Lingkungan, Pembangunan Keuangan, Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Terhadap Lingkungan Berkelanjutan Di Negara D-8. Taxpedia; Journal of Tax Policy, Economics, and Accounting, 1(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.61261/muctj.v1i2.38

Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2002). A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00005-8

Anbumozhi, V., Kalirajan Emeritus Professor, K., & Pratiwi Muyasyaroh, A. (2025). Putting a Price on Carbon in ASEAN and East Asia: Are Consumers Willing to Pay? ERIA Discussion Paper Series, 549. https://www.eria.org/uploads/Putting-a-Price-Carbon-ASEAN-Are-Consumers-Willing-to-Pay.pdf

Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and Co2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170144

Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.002

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Barus, E. B., & Wijaya, S. (2022). Penerapan Pajak Karbon Di Swedia Dan Finlandia Serta Perbandingannya Dengan Indonesia. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i2.1653

Best, R., Burke, P. J., & Jotzo, F. (2020). Carbon Pricing Efficacy: Cross-Country Evidence. Environ Resource Econ, 77, 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00436-x

Bibi, R. (2022). The relationship between trade openness, financial development and economic growth: evidence from Generalized method of moments. Journal of Environmental Science and Eco- Nomics.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Böhringer, C., Landis, F., & Rutherford, T. F. (2017). Carbon tax alternatives for the European Union: A general equilibrium perspective. Climate Policy, 17(S1), S1–S16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1266546

Chen, W., & Lei, Y. (2018). The impacts of carbon tax on carbon emission reduction and economic development in China. Energy Policy, 119, 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.056

Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

Haites, E., & Proost, S. (2018). Policy mixes for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 18(8), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1446987

Hasni, R., Dridi, D., & Ben Jebli, M. (2023). Do financial development, financial stability and renewable energy disturb carbon emissions? Evidence from asia–pacific economic cooperation economics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(35), 83198–83213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28418-8

Hossain, M. S. (2012). An econometric analysis for CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 3(3), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2012.33014

Huang, Y., Chen, F., Wei, H., Xiang, J., Xu, Z., & Akram, R. (2022). The Impacts of FDI Inflows on Carbon Emissions: Economic Development and Regulatory Quality as Moderators. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.820596

Ibrahim, R. L., Al-mulali, U., Ozturk, I., Bello, A. K., & Raimi, L. (2022). On the criticality of renewable energy to sustainable development: do green financial development, technological innovation, and economic complexity matter for …. Renewable Energy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122012769

IEA. (2019). ASEAN Renewable Energy Integration Analysis. Iea.Org. https://www.iea.org/reports/asean-renewable-energy-integration-analysis

IEA. (2023). ASEAN Renewables Investment: Opportunities and Challenges. Iea.Org. https://www.iea.org/search?q=ASEAN

Khan, H., Chen, T., Bibi, R., & Khan, I. (2023). Dose institutional quality influences the relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions ? PLoS ONE, 18(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291930

Liddle, B. (2014). Urbanization and energy use in Asian developing countries: A panel cointegration analysis. Asian Development Review, 31(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00019

Lolo, L. D. F. A., Maulana, A. D., & Pasaribu, D. N. (2022). Transparansi Pajak Karbon: Digitalisasi Pajak Karbon Sebagai Katalisator Dalam Pembangunan Rendah Karbon di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction, 5(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i1.32981

Metcalf, G. E., & Stock, J. H. (2020). Measuring the macroeconomic impact of carbon taxes. American Economic Review, 110(12), 3917–3954. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190621

Palupi, P. G. S., Muchtar, M., & Sihombing, P. R. (2023). Pengaruh Pajak Karbon, Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Fosil, Dan Pertumbuhan PDB Terhadap Emisi Karbon. Jurnalku, 3(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v3i2.385

Rasiah, R., & Vijayaraghavan, G. K. (2025). Greening in Southeast Asia (O. Academic (ed.); online edn). The Oxford Handbook on the Greening of Economic Development. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198883487.013.25

Saddler, H., Diesendorf, M., & Denniss, R. (2020). Greenhouse solutions with sustainable energy. UNSW Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203044012

Shaari, M. S., Hussain, N. E., Rahim, R. A., Ridzuan, A. R., & Masnan, F. (2025). Coal consumption as a moderator in the link between industrial output and life expectancy in ASEAN nations. Carbon Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00202-y

Shaikh, S. S., Amin, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Song, H. (2024). Going Green in ASEAN: Assessing the Role of Eco-Innovation, Green Energy, Industrialization, and Environmental Taxes in Achieving Carbon Neutrality. Sustainability Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3305

Shidiq, M., Htet, H., Rakhiemah, A. N., Abdullah, A., Pradnyaswari, I., & Suryadi, B. (2024). How effective is the carbon pricing implementation in ASEAN Member States to reduce regional emissions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1395(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1395/1/012032

Yu, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2022). The Synergy Green Innovation Effect of Green Innovation Subsidies and Carbon Taxes. Energy for the Future: Participatory and Multidisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Post-Carbon Cities and Societies, 14(6), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063453

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30